IRDA Guidelines: Key consumer centric points.

IRDA came out with numerous initiatives last year including draft health insurance guidelines. While these will help to confine the role of TPA to claims processing and not settlement, there are other vital issues that has to be addressed.

• Senior citizens disallowed increase in Sum Insured (SI) – Survivors of critical illness like cancer are also not given any increase in SI by the insurance company.

Action required – There should be mandatory allowance for inflation-linked increase in sum insured irrespective of past claims history.

• Need to cover prosthetics and artificial limbs for disabled – All insurance providers to be mandated by regulations to offer mediclaim and accident cover policies to cover the cost of provision of prosthesis/artificial limbs to the insured person, up to the sum insured and without any artificial cap. At the moment, not all insurance companies cover the cost of prosthetics.

Action required – need for mediclaim to cover prosthesis.

• 24 hour hospitalisation mandatory to approve claims – Today technological advancement does not necessitate hospitals to keep the insured for more than 24 hours in many cases.

Action required – More day-care procedures need to be added to mediclaim. IRDA should make insurance companies’ needs realistic rather than mechanical

• Cashless facility is restricted to preferred-provider-network (PPN) which does not include majority of high-end hospitals for government insurers. This issue is only for retail and not for corporate mediclaim policies.

Action required – If cashless is offered for corporate mediclaim, the same insurance company cannot disallow retail mediclam policies from getting same benefit. Just because individuals have less bargaining power, insurance companies can get away with it. Cashless facility must be re-started for retail consumers, at all Quality Council of India (QCI) accredited hospitals and nursing homes.

STANDARDIZATION IN HEALTH INSURANCE: STREAMLINED BUSINESS & SATISFIED CONSUMERS!

 

Health Insurance continues to be one of the most dynamic and fast evolving sectors of the Indian insurance industry. Gross written premiums by insurance companies has increased from Rs.17565 cr in FY’ 2005 to Rs.59898 cr in FY’2012 showing a very healthy 19% CAGR growth. The industry has shown significant improvement in operational parameters even as claims ratios continue to remain high. However, the growth is fraught with numerous challenges including efficiency, affordability and accessibility of health insurance. The efficiency in the health insurance system is also plagued by mistrust between providers and insurers due to non-standardized practices and formats in an evolving industry. Standardization therefore is critical to enhance quality delivery of health insurance, encourage innovation and greater penetration of health insurance in the country.

Health Insurance Guidelines 2013

The IRDA recently notified the health insurance guidelines 2013 to standardize health insurance in the country. The regulator has mentioned that the guidelines are meant to reduce ambiguity and enable all stakeholders to provide better services and enable customers to interact more effectively with insurers, third-party administrators and providers. The guidelines includes various facets of standardization including definitions of critical illnesses, definitions of commonly used insurance terms, list of excluded items in hospitalization indemnity policies, billing formats, discharge summary and standard contracts between TPA, insurers and hospitals. Undoubtedly, this represents a very important milestone in ushering standardization in the health insurance sector. Let’s dwell on each of these facets to appreciate the importance of this initiative.

The Guidelines aim to reduce the existing ambiguity between the insurer/reinsurer, provider and consumer due to varied critical illnesses definitions. The differences in the definitions of Critical Illnesses adopted by the different insurers have created confusion in the minds of consumers wherein products are difficult to compare and the industry especially at the time when insurers and re-insurers have to arrive at a point where lump sum payment is made. The availability of standard definitions would now ensure better comparability and uniformity in the understanding of critical illness definitions.

Another grey area that has been addressed is the list of excluded items.  As there is has been no detailed listing of such excluded expenses, and the interpretation of these exclusions is highly varied across different payers in the industry, many a times various items under the claims filed by hospital providers or individual policyholders are repudiated by the insurers but are disputed by the claimants. This is, thus, one major cause of acrimony between Insurance Companies and healthcare providers and also puts the consumer in inconvenience as out of pocket expenses goes up. The excluded items list driven by a  consensus between all the stakeholders of the industry and a uniform understanding of such ‘exclusions’ would be the key for better understanding of policy conditions by the policyholders and hospitals, which would in turn facilitate speedier roll out of health insurance in the country.

Standardizing billing formats would enable mapping of hospital information systems to specific data requirements of the Insurance companies for faster claim processing and enhanced analysis of data.

This would also facilitate electronic transmission of provider bills to the payers for processing and payment. The standardized format would now be part of the standard contract between insurers/TPA and the providers. Similarly, varied Discharge Summary format specific to payers often leads to delay in processing claims as requests have to be sent to providers to provide additional information. The standardized discharge summary would now be used across providers for benefit of all stakeholders and facilitate processing of claims at the payer end. The relevant information would integrate seamlessly with standard claim form and provider bills.

The guidelines also specify the minimum standard clauses of the service level agreement entered between the Insurer and the TPA as well as agreement between the healthcare provider and the Insurer/TPA. A skeletal framework for the contract would bring uniformity, more clarity about the service standards and minimize the chances of disputes over interpretation. The document would be instrumental in streamlining other standard processes and documents like pre-authorization form, discharge summary form, bill formats, etc.

The release of the health insurance guidelines also marks a new journey for the FICCI health insurance advisory group which would now look at new domain areas in health insurance including combating health insurance fraud, product innovation, data analytics and promoting quality in healthcare through health insurance. The group would continue to work towards realizing an ideal universe of health insurance business with satisfied customer at its core, greater penetration of health insurance products and affordable quality healthcare for the masses.

There are other facets of standardization in the IRDA guidelines including the Standard Insurance Terms and Standard Pre-authorization and Claim form. Insurance terms continue to remain jargons for the laymen. Terms notified in the guidelines would reduce ambiguity, enable all stakeholders to provide better services and enable customers to interact more effectively with insurers, TPAs and providers.  A common industry wide pre-authorization and claim form will significantly streamline processes at all stages. This will also enhance the ability of providers to obtain a timely prior authorization. By implementing it in an optical character recognition (OCR) format, the ability to transfer data from a handwritten paper based form to IT systems has been enhanced thus reducing the data entry issues for TPAs and insurers. Every company shall attach set of claim forms along with policy terms and conditions to the policyholder.

IRDA allows banks to act as insurance brokers

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has allowed banks to act as brokers and sell products of more than one insurer so as to increase the penetration of the sector across the country.

There is no capital requirement for insurance broking business carried out by banks, according to IRDA (Licensing of Banks as Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2013.

To qualify for the license, each bank will have to have the principal officer, an officer of general manager or equivalent category, who is appointed exclusively to carry out the functions of an insurance broker.

The license, once issued, will be valid for three years from the date of issue, it said, adding that the renewal of license can be applied 30 days before its expiry.

Every insurance broker will, before the commencement of the business, deposit and keep deposits with any scheduled bank as sum of Rs 50 lakh, it said.

The business of the insurance broker will have to be carried out in the such a manner that not more than 50 percent of the premium emanates from any one client.

“Not more than 25 per cent of insurance handled by the insurance broker in any financial year is placed with the insurance company within the promoter group, separately for life and general insurance business” IRDA said.

It also said the calculation of non-Indian interest in the applicant company shall be as per the limits applicable to the banking sector as decided from time to time by the government or the Reserve Bank.

While The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) approval is required for banks to become brokers, IRDA is of the opinion that in case of any dispute arising out of insurance transactions, its jurisdiction should prevail. It added that the laws applicable to insurance contracts shall be enforced and information in this regard shall be furnished to the RBI.

 

How IRDA’s recent health insurance reforms will benefit you

The IRDA is trying to streamline the definitions so that it becomes simpler and process wise everybody has clarity on what the claims etc are. So, number of changes that have come up; one, in terms of definition on deductibles wherein it defines how deductibles is wherein whatever is the amount of a person’s claim there is certain amount which is reduced from it. Therefore, if deductible is Rs 1,000 and claim is Rs 3,000 then he is paid out Rs 2,000. On the other hand if claim is Rs 1,000 then he is not paid anything. It also mentions how a deductible has to be claimed, what will be the amount whether it is annually or on per claim basis.

The second point is of co-payment wherein a certain percentages paid by the policyholder and there also the change that has come about is, any co-payment is excluded from the sum assured.

There is another change in terms of portability; portability is basically where one can move policy from one company to the other. It also allowed moving it between policies of the same company itself. That has been excluded.

There is a definition of hospitals being relaxed and any hospital, which is registered under the Clinical Establishment Act of 2010 is there, couple of changes in terms of maternity, it is expanded a little bit including complicated procedures etc and also today lawful terminations of pregnancies and there is another change which has come in terms new born definition also interestingly allows adopted children.

Therefore, a lot of changes are coming in and definitions are in place. It makes it easier for the customer to understand and also no misuse from the insurance company.

 

External administrators to service PSU insurers till in-house entity matures.

Decision on terminating services after review of new entity
Public sector general insurers are likely to continue availing themselves of the services of external third party administrators (TPAs) to settle medical insurance claims even after setting up a common in-house entity to settle such claims.

SETTLING CLAIMS
The four public sectors insurers — New India Assurance, Oriental Insurance, United India Insurance and National Insurance — are currently working on setting up a common joint venture company to settle medical claims. However, till the joint venture TPA attains efficiency, general insurers will continue their existing arrangement with external TPAs, said G. Srinivasan, Chairman and Managing Director, New India Assurance.

“External TPAs will be a competition to the in-house entity after it is set up. The performance of the in-house entity will be reviewed and then take a decision (on terminating services of external TPA),”
The proposal to set up a common administrator for the state-owned insurers, who control 70 per cent of the Rs 15,000-crore health insurance market, will enable them to reduce costs, check fraudulent claims and resolve disputes in claim settlements faster. Hence, it is likely to plug leakages and bring down losses in the health insurance segment.

The joint venture TPA entity of public sector insurers is expected to be fully operational by April next year.

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/banking/external-administrators-to-service-psu-insurers-till-inhouse-entity-matures/article4996295.ece

Irda Amends Norms on Health Insurance

Just a couple of days after standardisation guidelines for the health insurance  sector became effective, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority announced some amendments on 3 July 2013.

Of the 46 standardised terminologies for health insurance, the regulator has revised 19. Some changes just rectify typographical or grammatical errors.

For instance, the original definition of ‘unproven/experimental treatment’ missed a ‘not’, changing the scope of the rule. The revised definition now reads: “Treatment including drug experimental therapy which is not based on established medical practice in India, is treatment experimental or unproven.”

The amended guidelines also have a few major additions and omissions. The definition of ‘dependent child’ has been deleted from the list of standardised terminologies. So, insurers are now free to interpret this in their own way.

Under the new norms, an establishment registered with the local authorities does not have any minimum in-patient bed requirement. The requirement of having at least 10 in-patient beds in towns (with a population less than 10 lakh) and 15 inpatient beds in other places is mandatory for unregistered hospitals only.

The definition of ‘medical practitioners’ has been expanded to include people registered under the Central Council of Indian Medicine or the Central Council of Homoeopathy or any similar council set up by the government. Portability has also been redefined to exclude switching of plans with the same insurer.

Relaxations have been made for maternity expenses or treatment. Maternity expenses would now mean any medical treatment or expense traceable to childbirth, including caesarean sections during hospitalisation and lawful abortions during the policy period. Earlier, the benefit was restricted to two deliveries or abortions either during the policy term or lifetime of the insured.

On the flip side, expenses incurred before or after deliveries as well as abortions have been excluded from maternity expenses. The term ‘newborn baby’ now includes adopted children.

 

 

 

 

Despite its immense potential in India, health insurance is in an anaemic state.

India is already boldly taking its place as one of the leading healthcare markets in the world, forecasted to be one of the top 10 pharmaceutical markets by 2017, with a projected market size of $25 billion, and a CAGR between 11-13 per cent for the period 2012-17.

A sustainable health insurance system is absolutely critical.

Fortunately, this process is underway. As of 2010, over 300 million people (25 per cent of the population) had some form of health insurance – an astonishing 445 per cent increase from 2004.

Even more astonishing are World Bank estimates that by 2015, 50 per cent of the population (or approximately 630 million people) will be able to access a health insurance programme.

But India’s nascent and fragmented insurance market is facing serious issues that require thoughtful solutions.

NEED FOR CHANGE

Priority 1: Responding to competition with innovation: The arrival of new entrants, coupled with an increasingly aware consumer population has placed a burden on companies to manage – and differentiate – their portfolio.

The growth of India’s health insurance industry has brought forth some compelling business models and significant opportunities.

But, as patients across India will attest, though there is a myriad of options in insurers, there is almost no variation across offerings.

Success will require a proactive approach to capturing new customers.

Priority 2: Building an appropriate pricing structure: Across all levels of the population, people are beginning to understand that insurance is a necessary step to ensuring the affordability of better standards of care. This has resulted in a relatively high “willingness to pay”. The onus, then, is on health insurance companies to build relevant, appropriate pricing models.

Priority 3: Stabilising and legitimising the claims process: Health insurance companies today (across all segments) are burdened with inconsistent relationships with unregulated stakeholders — from providers to patients.

The Secretary-General of the General Insurance Council estimates that 15 per cent of insurance claims processed in India are fraudulent (patient fraud, inflated medical bills, underwriting lapses, process gaps, and so on). Even more shocking is the estimate that around Rs 800 crore is lost on inaccurate or falsified claims – every year.

MOVING FORWARD

Both, existing and new players need to acknowledge that there is huge gap between the objective of universal health insurance in India and the current state.

Without doubt, the industry needs a careful balance of stabilisation and innovation across the board as well as a continued focus on managing public perception. Efforts are also needed to consolidate data across stakeholders and transform it into accurate, actionable information and customer-focused products.